Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4839 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Core i5-760
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $48.00 vs $433.00
- Up to 72% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900K - $0.20 vs $0.72 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 156% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-760 - 605 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7036 minutes ago
Buy for $433 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7036 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-760 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |