In Dead Space, the Core i5-760 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $263 cheaper!
Core i5-760
- Up to 80% cheaper – $66.65 vs $329.95
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Dead Space – $0.38 vs $1.86/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Dead Space
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 177 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 18, 2010
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i5-760 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Average FPS
175 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
96%
Price, $
$66.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
177 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
20%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
20%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-760 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-760 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-760 Jul 18th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
