Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4209 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Core i5-760
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $48.00 vs $76.80
- Up to 23% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-12100F - $0.41 vs $0.53 per FPS
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 24% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-760 - 144 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7193 minutes ago
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7193 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-760 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |