The Core i5-760 is a slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G3900, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $21.04 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-760
- Up to 48% cheaper – $23.00 vs $44.04
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 51 vs 95 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Core i5-760 vs Celeron G3900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
655
100%
Min 1% FPS
368
100%
Price, $
$44.04
52%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
50%
Core i5-760 vs Celeron G3900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-760 vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-760 vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-760 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |