In Atomfall, the Core i5-7500T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9500, it's also the same value for money, as it's only $5 cheaper!
Core i5-7500T
- Up to 4% cheaper – $130.43 vs $135.76
- Up to 4% cheaper
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-9500
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7500T vs Core i5-9500: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
203 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
96%
Price, $
$130.43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Core i5-9500
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$135.76
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7500T vs Core i5-9500 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7500T vs Core i5-9500 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i5-9500
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7500T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9500 Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
