In Deathloop, the Core i5-7500T is same performance as the Core i3-6100. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $60 more expensive!
Core i5-7500T
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core i3-6100
- Up to 46% cheaper – $70.65 vs $130.43
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in Deathloop – $0.32 vs $0.59/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7500T vs Core i3-6100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.43
54%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
54%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7500T vs Core i3-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7500T vs Core i3-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7500T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
