In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7500T is slightly slower than the Core i3-4130 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $89 more expensive!
Core i5-7500T
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4130
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 183 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 69% cheaper – $41.00 vs $130.43
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.22 vs $0.72/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7500T vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
99%
Price, $
$130.43
31%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
31%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
183 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7500T vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7500T vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7500T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
