In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-7500T is slightly slower than the Core i3-3220T. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $60 cheaper!
Core i5-7500T
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 31% cheaper – $130.43 vs $189.95
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 28% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.56 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 28% better value in The Last of Us Part I
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 243 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-7500T vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
230 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
95%
Price, $
$130.43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
72%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7500T vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7500T vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7500T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
