In Deathloop, the Core i5-7440HQ is slightly slower than the Celeron G1610. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7440HQ
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 45 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Celeron G1610
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7440HQ vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7440HQ vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7440HQ vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7440HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7440HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $250.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1155 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
