In Rust, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2667 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7400T
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 35 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 221 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Xeon E5-2667 v3: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
216 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
92%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Xeon E5-2667 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Xeon E5-2667 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2667 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $2,057.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 135 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
