In Deathloop, the Core i5-7400T is slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $491 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 86% cheaper – $78.02 vs $569.00
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Deathloop – $0.35 vs $2.14/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Up to 22% faster in Deathloop – 265 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 3 days newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 8 years and 3 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
83%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
265 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
198 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569
13%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
16%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
55%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
