In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 7900 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $329 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 181 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 81% cheaper – $78.02 vs $407.00
- Up to 81% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.43 vs $2.40/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900
- Is 6 years and 10 days newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 6 years and 10 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 9 7900: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
93%
Price, $
$407
19%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
18%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 9 7900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 9 7900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
56%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
46%
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900 Jan 14th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $429.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
