Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1402 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Core i5-7400T
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $64.56 vs $345.00
- Up to 77% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.54 vs $2.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-7400T - 145 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
Buy for $345 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400T | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |