In Deathloop, the Core i5-7400T is same performance as the Ryzen 7 1700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 1700X
- Is 1 month and 27 days newer – Mar 02, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 1 month and 27 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 7 1700X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 7 1700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 7 1700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 1700X Mar 2nd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $399.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
