The Core i5-7400T is a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 4600G, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $97.84 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-7400T
- Up to 60% cheaper – $64.56 vs $162.40
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 4600G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 5 4600G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
178
94%
Min 1% FPS
119
95%
Price, $
$64.56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 4600G
Jul 21st, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$162.4
39%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
42%
Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 5 4600G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 5 4600G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Ryzen 5 4600G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Ryzen 5 4600G
Jul 21st, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-7400T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 4600G |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | $154.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |