In Deathloop, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Phenom II X6 1045T and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $18 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2010
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Phenom II X6 1045T
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 23% cheaper – $59.77 vs $78.02
- Up to 23% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Deathloop – $0.26 vs $0.35/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Phenom II X6 1045T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$78.02
76%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
74%
Phenom II X6 1045T
Sep 1st, 2010
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Phenom II X6 1045T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Phenom II X6 1045T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Phenom II X6 1045T
Sep 1st, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Phenom II X6 1045T Sep 1st, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 1st, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR2), 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
