In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the FX-6100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $44 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
FX-6100
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 57% cheaper – $33.90 vs $78.02
- Up to 57% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.16 vs $0.42/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs FX-6100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
88%
Price, $
$78.02
43%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
38%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
206 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$33.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
