In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the FX-4350 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $5 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 6% cheaper – $78.02 vs $82.71
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-4350
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 5% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.41 vs $0.43/FPS
- Up to 5% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
92%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
95%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
