In Deathloop, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 235. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $199 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 72% cheaper – $78.02 vs $277.30
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Deathloop – $0.35 vs $1.15/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 5 235
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 4 days newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 8 years and 4 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core Ultra 5 235: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
91%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$277.3
28%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core Ultra 5 235 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core Ultra 5 235 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
6 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 235 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $257.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
