In Atomfall, the Core i5-7400T is slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $373 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 83% cheaper – $78.02 vs $451.09
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Atomfall – $0.39 vs $1.81/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
200 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
81%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$451.09
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
50%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
