Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-13900KS in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i5-7400T is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900KS, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $364.44 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-7400T
- Up to 85% cheaper – $64.56 vs $429.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900KS
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
193
79%
Min 1% FPS
133
81%
Price, $
$64.56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
244
100%
Min 1% FPS
165
100%
Price, $
$429
15%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
19%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-13900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-13900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
50%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
