In F1 25, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $422 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 84% cheaper – $78.02 vs $499.99
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in F1 25 – $0.44 vs $2.56/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in F1 25
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i9-13900
- Up to 11% faster in F1 25 – 195 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in F1 25
- Is 6 years newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 6 years newer
F1 25 FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-13900: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
176 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
90%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
195 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
15%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
54%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
