In Atomfall, the Core i5-7400T is slower than the Core i9-12900KS. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $302 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 79% cheaper – $78.02 vs $379.99
- Up to 79% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in Atomfall – $0.38 vs $1.57/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 35 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Core i9-12900KS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 241 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer – Apr 05, 2022 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-12900KS: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
201 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
83%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900KS
Apr 5th, 2022
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$379.99
20%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
24%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-12900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-12900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
55%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i9-12900KS
Apr 5th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KS Apr 5th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $739.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
