In Alan Wake 2, the Core i5-7400T is slightly faster than the Core i9-12900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $222 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 3% faster in Alan Wake 2 – 240 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Alan Wake 2
- Up to 74% cheaper – $78.02 vs $300.33
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 75% better value in Alan Wake 2 – $0.32 vs $1.29/FPS
- Up to 75% better value in Alan Wake 2
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer
Alan Wake 2 FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
232 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
99%
Price, $
$300.33
25%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
25%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
58%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
