In Atomfall, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $165 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 68% cheaper – $78.02 vs $242.93
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in Atomfall – $0.39 vs $1.11/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
200 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
92%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$242.93
32%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
35%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
61%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
