In Rust, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i7-6700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $152 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Aug 05, 2015
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
- Up to 66% cheaper – $78.02 vs $229.95
- Up to 66% cheaper
- Up to 64% better value in Rust – $0.36 vs $1.01/FPS
- Up to 64% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 35 vs 91 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Core i7-6700K
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 226 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-6700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
216 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
87%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
33%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
36%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-6700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-6700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700K Aug 5th, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 5th, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $339.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35W | Power Consumption | 91W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
