In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly faster than the Core i7-6700 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $32 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 181 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jul 01, 2015
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Up to 29% cheaper – $78.02 vs $109.62
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 31% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.43 vs $0.62/FPS
- Up to 31% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-6700
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-6700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
176 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
97%
Price, $
$109.62
71%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
69%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-6700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-6700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700 Jul 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
