In Starfield, the Core i5-7400T is slightly faster than the Core i7-4930K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield – 91 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-4930K
No clear advantages
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-4930K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
91 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-4930K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-4930K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-4930K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4930K Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2011 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
