In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i7-3770K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $52 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 40% cheaper – $78.02 vs $130.06
- Up to 40% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.42 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Core i7-3770K
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 190 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-3770K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
96%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.06
59%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
62%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-3770K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-3770K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3770K Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $313.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
