In Atomfall, the Core i5-7400T is slightly faster than the Core i7-2720QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 200 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 6 years newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-2720QM
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-2720QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-2720QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-2720QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-2720QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2720QM Jan 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
