In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i7-2635QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7400T
- Is 6 years newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 6 years newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-2635QM
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-2635QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
93%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-2635QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-2635QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-2635QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2635QM Jan 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1224 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
