In Atomfall, the Core i5-7400T is slower than the Core i7-13700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 6 years newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-13700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
200 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
83%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-13700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-13700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
58%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
