In Rust, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $303 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 80% cheaper – $78.02 vs $380.99
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Rust – $0.35 vs $1.61/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 236 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
217 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
77%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
236 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
20%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
59%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
