In Atomfall, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-4690K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $87 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jun 02, 2014
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 53% cheaper – $78.02 vs $165.25
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in Atomfall – $0.39 vs $0.80/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 35 vs 88 Watts
- Consumes up to 60% less energy
Core i5-4690K
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 205 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-4690K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
200 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
97%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
205 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.25
47%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
49%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-4690K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-4690K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-4690K Jun 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $243.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 88 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
