In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-4440S and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $29 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-4440S
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 182 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 37% cheaper – $49.36 vs $78.02
- Up to 37% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.27 vs $0.43/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-4440S: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
63%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
63%
Core i5-4440S
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
182 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-4440S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-4440S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-4440S
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-4440S Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
