In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-3470S and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $13 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-3470S
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 191 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 17% cheaper – $65.00 vs $78.02
- Up to 17% cheaper
- Up to 21% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.34 vs $0.43/FPS
- Up to 21% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-3470S: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
94%
Price, $
$78.02
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
79%
Core i5-3470S
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-3470S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-3470S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3470S
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3470S Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
