In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-3340M and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $24 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 4 years and 2 days newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 4 years and 2 days newer
Core i5-3340M
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 241 vs 231 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 31% cheaper – $54.04 vs $78.02
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.22 vs $0.33/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-3340M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
231 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
96%
Price, $
$78.02
69%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
67%
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-3340M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-3340M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3340M Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
