In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-2500S and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $2 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 2% cheaper – $78.02 vs $79.72
- Up to 2% cheaper
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-2500S
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 192 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 2% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.41 vs $0.42/FPS
- Up to 2% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-2500S: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
94%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
98%
Core i5-2500S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
192 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.72
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-2500S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-2500S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-2500S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2500S Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
