In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-2500K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $85 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 52% cheaper – $78.02 vs $162.97
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.33 vs $0.67/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-2500K
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 240 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-2500K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
232 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
174 FPS
97%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$162.97
47%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
49%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-2500K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-2500K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2500K Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | $216.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
