In Atomfall, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-10600K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $106 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 58% cheaper – $78.02 vs $183.99
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Atomfall – $0.39 vs $0.85/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i5-10600K
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 216 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-10600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
200 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
93%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$183.99
42%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
46%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-10600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-10600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
62%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
