In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly faster than the Core i3-8100 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $42 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 182 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 35% cheaper – $78.02 vs $120.32
- Up to 35% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.42 vs $0.67/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-8100
- Is 9 months and 1 day newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 9 months and 1 day newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-8100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
178 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
134 FPS
99%
Price, $
$120.32
64%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
63%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-8100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-8100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $117.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
