The Core i5-7400T is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-7300 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $8.18 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of the Core i3-7300
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 13% cheaper – $56.38 vs $64.56
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-7300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
178
96%
Min 1% FPS
119
97%
Price, $
$64.56
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
83%
Core i3-7300
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$56.38
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-7300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-7300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-7300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-7300
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-7400T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
