In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i3-530 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $24 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i3-530
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 211 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 31% cheaper – $53.83 vs $78.02
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.25 vs $0.42/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-530: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
183 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
87%
Price, $
$78.02
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
60%
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-530 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $113.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
