In Deathloop, the Core i5-7400T is same performance as the Core i3-4170. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $21 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 21% cheaper – $78.02 vs $98.95
- Up to 21% cheaper
- Up to 22% better value in Deathloop – $0.35 vs $0.45/FPS
- Up to 22% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4170
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4170: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
78%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4170 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4170 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | May 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $117.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
