In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is same performance as the Core i3-4160. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $53 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4160
- Up to 68% cheaper – $24.99 vs $78.02
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $0.43/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4160: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
32%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
30%
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
181 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4160 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4160 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4160 Jul 21st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
