In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i3-4150T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $51 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 186 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 65% cheaper – $26.99 vs $78.02
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.14 vs $0.42/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4150T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
98%
Price, $
$78.02
34%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
33%
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
186 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4150T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4150T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | May 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
