In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i5-7400T is slightly faster than the Core i3-4130. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $37 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 1% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 113 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4130
- Up to 47% cheaper – $41.00 vs $78.02
- Up to 47% cheaper
- Up to 48% better value in The Callisto Protocol – $0.36 vs $0.69/FPS
- Up to 48% better value in The Callisto Protocol
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
113 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
80 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
52%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
52%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
112 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
80 FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
