In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i3-3217U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7400T
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
Core i3-3217U
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 245 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-3217U: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
230 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
93%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-3217U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-3217U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
