In Counter-Strike 2, the Core i5-7400T is quite a bit slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 35 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 37% faster in Counter-Strike 2 – 385 vs 282 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in Counter-Strike 2
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer
Counter-Strike 2 FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
282 FPS
73%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
78%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35W | Power Consumption | 58W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
