In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-7400T is slightly faster than the Core i3-10100 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $72 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 230 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 48% cheaper – $78.02 vs $149.94
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.33 vs $0.66/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
225 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
98%
Price, $
$149.94
52%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
50%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
